The Wuss Factor
Last week, the latest unemployment numbers were released and no one is happy about them. The White House blames the Republican-dominated Congress for not meeting them halfway on job creation policies. Congress pointed its soiled fingers at President Obama for offering ideas that kill jobs. Actually both sides got it right; they are both wrong.
Oh, I could
elaborate on the eloquent philosophy of Stephen Stills, who once sang, “Nobody’s
right when everybody’s wrong,” because the current situation in that great
sandbox which we refer to as “inside the beltway” is a classic example of this
idea. Instead, I may draw on the thoughts
of a veteran political operative, former Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell. Our ex-state leader has never minced words
at any time in his long varied career from district attorney to mayor to
governor and sports analyst to party leader. In his current book and subsequent book tour, Rendell has called out both
sides for being wusses.
Rendell has
explained that both sides are fearful of losing jobs: their own! The Republicans, he says, don’t have the
courage to stand up to their base about the issue of reducing the deficit by
way of raising revenue (i.e., taxes). On
the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue, Rendell states that the Democrats
likewise are unwilling to stand up to the senior voters about cutting Social
Security and Medicare.
Ed, from
your mouth to God’s ears, and subsequently to God’s fingertips where a bolt of
lightning leveled somewhere between the White House and Capitol Hill might
prove to both sides that there are bigger issues at stake than just their job
security.
The economy
is the biggest issue being held hostage at the hands of extremists on both
sides. Republicans refuse to listen to
ideas about raising taxes on their wealthy friends, believing that spending
cuts and only spending cuts will reduce the deficit. If it were only that easy! Even worse is their overall “no compromise”
attitude, which may play well to their constituents but brings government to a
standstill. Of course, there is a lot to
be said for a show of strength, but there is also a strong argument for
wisdom. A wise legislator would know what
issues to favor and what arguments to make at the right time for the greater
good, and which issues to put on the shelf for the time being. I don’t see any displays of wisdom coming
from the halls of the GOP-led Congress.
Obama has
been taking a lot of flak for his economic policies that aren’t working. I hesitate to use the word failure, because
I refuse to believe that we can get out of this economic mess as quickly as we
got into it. It took us eight years to
bring the economy to these depths. Why does everyone believe that it will take
less than four years to climb out? This does not make sense.
The
President’s policies may appear to be failing, but have they actually been
given a chance to succeed? His signature
Obamacare is being torn apart by his enemies, and the damned thing hasn’t even
been fully implemented yet. Of course,
the President appears to come up short on his “hope and change” programs, but
it certainly didn’t help his case when we the people saddled him with a
contrary legislative branch.
Rendell is
correct about entitlements, if for no other reason than in the spirit of — and here’s
that dreaded “c” word again — compromise. Obama and the Democrats need to have a heart-to-heart talk with this
country’s senior citizens about their monthly Social Security checks, and their
Medicare benefits. Maybe another White
House Garden beer summit is in order, although I would send the teatotaler
Biden somewhere else if and when it does happen.
Some seniors
I know take full advantage of these two “socialist” programs even as they rant
and rail against both as being intrusive to their lives. They will shout to the high heavens in
agreement with Fox News on these issues, but will they put their benefits where
Fox’s mouth is? Granted, they feel
entitled to their payments since it was deducted from their paychecks for all
those years.
Hey seniors,
I have been contributing to Social Security since I was 14. (I worked at a
bakery for two weeks before I was sidelined with a hip injury.) I am now 52 and Social Security may no longer
be viable by the time I hit 65 (or is it 67?). Whatever! You’ll shout along with
your Tea Party comrades that we shouldn’t let the deficit grow for the sake of
our children and grandchildren, yet you won’t allow any trimming to the two
government programs that add the greatest amount to the deficit. Seniors, WTF?
Of course, I
shouldn’t say the government is entirely to blame for our mess. The private sector (i.e., Wall Street) has to
shoulder some of the blame for the recession. The same can be said for the economists who get everyone’s expectations
high (maybe too high) every month with economic forecasts that turn out to be
rosier than originally thought. Then
the statistics are released, economists express their disappointment, and
everyone’s emotional and financial fortunes follow suit.
Hey,
economists, you can’t have Christmas come every month! Perhaps your forecasts should be tempered
with some doses of reality and pragmatism. Don’t get everyone’s hopes up so high that nothing short of 100%
employment would satisfy the people.
So, everyone
put your fingers down and learn to use the idea of compromise. It’s been shown to work before to get
problems solved. We should probably also
learn to accept the idea of shared sacrifice for the greater good. That concept pulled our nation out of the
Great Depression and got us through World War II. It‘s these concepts that made this nation
great not so long ago. If we can’t use
these ideas to pull us together, then this country of wusses deserves the governance
that we get.
(Thank you
for reading.)
1 Comments:
I too started working at 14 years old -- I washed dishes at a Perkins Pancake House from 5 pm to 5 pm on Friday and Saturday nights. After almost 40 years of contributing to Social Security and Medicare, I damn well expect that they will available to me when I retire. But I believe that at some point, we will need to pick a date and say that any children born after that date will not be included in these seemingly financially unsustainable programs.
Post a Comment
<< Home