The Secret Word Is: Bipartisanship
Mine eyes
have seen a sign of the apocalypse, and I am not afraid, for it was beautiful!
A few weeks
ago I beheld a photograph of political enemies actually clasping hands in
friendship! The occasion was a coming
together of ideological foes to do the job which we the people elected them to
do, namely, serving we the people. It
happened in New Jersey, of all places! Republican Governor Chris Christie — who only a month ago denounced
President Obama as a clueless leader — actually worked shoulder-to-shoulder with
Obama to bring relief to those state residents whose lives have been devastated
by Hurricane (or Superstorm, take your pick) Sandy.
I am still
in awe that this act of — dare I say it — bipartisanship happened in my
lifetime! Hundreds of copies of this
photo should be printed, framed and hung in every Congressional office in
Washington. That way, those ne’er do
wells who we elect to represent our best interests can look at the picture
when political gridlock threatens the progress of any legislation which would
actually improve our lives, and know that conflict resolution is a very real
and tangible goal. Look, see the
picture! It’s been done! Bipartisanship has happened! Or they
could throw darts at the picture and the concept.
Perhaps the
concept is the problem. Maybe we should
break down the word into easy to remember syllables so that even members of Congress
can readily grasp the idea of working together for a common goal. Let’s see…
Bi – rhymes
with another word used in legislation writing as used in the sentence: “This
bill is sponsored by the Honorable Representative from East Gybip,
Lester Cowznofski.” It implies
ownership, even though in our word the syllable “bi” actually implies two, as
in more than one, as in more than just ourselves to think and care about.
Par — Congresspeople, think of something here which will help you remember how our word is
connected. Think of golf, okay? Think of that term which denotes the maximum
number of stroke allowed for each hole, which should jog many happy memories of
golf rounds with lobbyists bending your ear to betray your constituents in
favor of their clients, or big money campaign donors who are just corrupting
the entire system.
Ti — no, not
the old Rogers and Hammerstein reference of a drink with jam and bread, but
rather the first half of a slang term for a woman’s breast. Does that make this syllable easy to remember? I thought it would!
San — um,
sorry, I don’t have anything here. You’re on your own.
Ship — a boat,
okay? As in a vehicle, vessel, or
concept that can be steered smoothly forward for the common good.
Bi-par-ti-san-ship. Go ahead, put them together. Contemplate it, grasp it, and know that it is
viable. It’s not just a word to yell at
the other person when you’re frustrated that things aren’t going your way. It can be a way of life!
Anyway, back
to our story about the two very mean-to-each-other political animals who have
seen the light, and put aside their differences to help people in need. Some friends of these politicians understand,
support and rejoice in this newfound camaraderie. While others are aghast, ashamed that one of
their own would actually lower themselves to touch the other in a friendly
manner.
Needless to
say, Fox News was just beside itself with rage at Governor Christie. President Obama, on the other hand, got
complimented for acting “presidential” and exhibiting, dare I say it,
leadership! Go figure!
One Fox News
commentator said that the display of the governor and president being seen
close together was okay, but then he asked, “Where is FEMA?” At this point, I pressed a button on my television
remote, which took me to the Morning Joe show on MSNBC, where a reporter was
interviewing a FEMA employee on site somewhere in South Jersey. If I had had a direct phone line, I could have
called the Fox and Friends set and told them that I found FEMA; they’re on
MSNBC!
Silly Fox and
Friends!
This same
“news” program (notice the sarcastically placed quotation marks) implied that a
subsequent telethon to raise money for victims of Hurricane Sandy could have
been nothing more than a fund raiser for President Obama just four days before
the election. Fox and Friends wasn’t
questioning the idea of the telethon, but they were questioning the timing of
the telethon. Yes, well, sometimes these
things work out that way. I mean, they
could have been proactive about this disaster and staged it months ago in
preparation for a large scale natural disaster, but what would they have called
it? Telethon for Tornado X? Benefit for Victims of a Hurricane to be
Named at a Later Date? Rockers for a Blizzard Sometime Next Winter? These do not exactly entice people to open
their checkbooks, not to mention grumblings of people being swindled in the
name of a disaster which hasn’t happened
yet!
Unfortunately,
Fox, these benefits usually play better post-cataclysm. This way, the telethon producers can shoot
fresh disaster footage to play between the performances and the scenes of
devastation would appeal to the viewer’s heartfelt sympathies…um, what was I
talking about? Oh yes, bipartisanship!
This display
of people coming together was a grand thing to witness. I only wish I could be optimistic that this
could be the start of a new era in Washington, but I won’t hold my breath. Too many other interests have too much resources
and money invested in ideas that would not be served if politicians were encouraged
to work together more often. Too bad for
them, and too good for us, the people!
(Thank you
for reading. Listen up, Congress! Learn to work together or you just might be
updating your resume in 2014.)
1 Comments:
HILLARY IN 2016!!!!! :-)
and I'd still take Paul Ryan anytime...
Love,
Janey
Ambassador of Love
Post a Comment
<< Home