Drink, Drink, Drink
President
Obama’s 2013 State of the Union address may have seem lackluster at first
glance; much of it was the same old
routine of reviving liberal ideas, like raising the minimum wage and investing
money in education. The reaction from
the opposition was also the same old, same old. Stand and applaud the President when he
extols general platitudes about patriotism and democracy, then sit on your
hands when he offers details about how we can advance the world’s greatest
democracy.
Fortunately
this time around, the President was able to speak his mind without
interruptions. During one previous
address, a Republican Congressman shouted out You Lie! while the
President spoke; another time, Chief Justice Roberts could be seen shaking his
head and muttering a barely audible objection. This time, I expected Congressional guest and gun advocate Ted Nugent to
open up his right wing yap and begin shouting obscenities from the visitor’s
gallery. The speech would have had to
cease until Capital Police escorted/dragged Nugent kicking and screaming from
the premises.
Now that
would have made this a more memorable State of the Union. Instead, the opposition upstaged the
President with nothing more than a stage prop: a bottle of water.
Prior to the
event, commentators on MSNBC’s Morning Joe decried the idea that the Republican
Party would have not one, but two rebuttals to Obama’s speech. The arrangement emphasizes the
schism/chasm/crevasse within the Republican Party these days. Rand Paul was scheduled to give a rebuttal
from the extreme Tea Party wing of the GOP; I have not heard one word about his
response. On the other hand, there have
been plenty of analyses about the mainstream Republican response from Senator
Marco Rubio. His speech itself was in
many ways a same old/same old rehash attacking the President’s policies, but it
became noteworthy because he did something no other politician has ever done in
a public forum: he took a break.
Rubio has
demonstrated that he is an intelligent and charismatic force within the
Republican Party. He should not need
props (like, say, an empty chair, Mr. Eastwood) to make his point. Thus it was noteworthy when he stopped
suddenly to take a swig of water from a Poland Springs ® water bottle. Really, Mr. Rubio, product placement in a
nationally televised speech? Did you
have to go there?
Here you are,
the eyes of the world are upon you, you’re
making what you believe are good points against government regulation of global
warming - which many people argue brought
on such phenomena as more intense hurricanes, hotter average temperatures, and
more droughts — and you have to drink a
glass of water because you are parched. This sort of defeats your global warning argument. Don’t you hate when that happens?
So, what
else did Rubio have to say? Um…don’t
know, don’t care, and don’t care enough to replay the YouTube video to find
out. In any event, whatever he said
could not have been so important that he needed to take a moment to swallow
some H2O. His drink distracted from his
message. Rubio managed to upstage
himself, if such a thing is even possible.
Taking five
during a major address has not happened in recorded history. It’s not like someone never did it before;
it’s something that just isn’t done, PERIOD. We can imagine how history would have been different if Lincoln had
paused in the middle of the Gettysburg Address and announced to the crowd,
“Please excuse me for a moment. I’m over
50 now and I have an urge to use the Necessary.” Or what if, after FDR intoned
those immortal words “We have nothing to fear but fear itself” proclaimed,
“Smoke if you got ‘em!” Or in our
immediate future the President himself might pause in the middle of another
polemic against gun violence and say, “You know, I’ve got this incredible
craving to do some skeet shooting now. If you’ll excuse me…” Water/coffee/cigarette
breaks ruin the rhythm of the verbal communication moment. Written communication is another matter
entirely. I can take a break from
writing this entry and you, the reader, would never know it.
So, I’ll
confess here: I did take a break a few
paragraphs back. I saved what I had
written up to the end of paragraph six, took a shower, went to work for eight
hours, came home, ate dinner, wrote a little more, went to bed for a few hours and started
writing again…and I’ll bet you didn’t
even miss me! Ah, the beauty of blog
writing!
Rubio, on
the other hand, has contributed another memorable moment to American political
history. It would not surprise me in the
weeks ahead if some enterprising political wonk turns this into a drinking
game. See Marco Rubio on television,
take a drink! Hear the words global
warming, take another drink! Hear the
word sequester anywhere on television, radio, or even live in polite
conversation…and chug the whole damn bottle!
There may be
some very dry economic times ahead for all of us if the sequester cuts are
allowed to happen. We might as well
hydrate ourselves while we can…
(Thank you
for reading. “Drink, drink, let the
toast start/May young hearts never part…” – Sigmund Romberg, The Student
Prince.)
1 Comments:
Has any irrefutable evidence been provided that Rubio's bottle actually contained water? Might it have been Bombay gin, know for its thirst-quenching properties? And if Rubio was indeed swilling Bombay in front of a live international audience, might I suggest he add a twist of refreshing lime?
Post a Comment
<< Home