The Loser Budget
The election
took place four months ago, and the Democrats retained control of the Executive
Branch. I only bring up this “Oh, duh!”
piece of news because some people in Washington are behaving like the election
never happened at all. I’m not talking
about Karl “We can’t declare Obama the winner yet” Rove; it’s too obvious that
he is still in a state of delusional denial. No, I am talking about some members of Congress, namely Paul Ryan.
Now you
would think since he was half of the losing ticket that the GOP offered in 2012
Ryan would have figured it out by now. Weren’t the warning signs obvious? Didn’t he see Ann Romney sobbing – not from joy — as the final poll
results were reported on election night? Hasn’t he noticed that Joe Biden has not moved out of his residence yet,
now nearly a full two months after Inauguration Day? And, speaking of which, hasn’t Ryan figured
out why he has no memory of himself taking the oath of office?
This week,
Ryan presented the House version of the federal budget, and guess what? It seemed identical to the budgets he has
presented the last three years. During that time, as the GOP gleefully repeated notes, the
Democratic-controlled Senate has not passed a budget. Maybe someone should put two and two together
and realize, “Hey the Senate hasn’t passed a budget in three years because they
keep getting presented with a House budget that has LOSER written all over it!”
Ryan’s
proposals promise to balance the budget in ten years. He’ll do it by cutting and slashing, changing
Medicare to a voucher plan, and…oh, yes, his proposed savings are dependent on
repealing Obamacare. How odd! The same party that encourages people to own
tools (guns) which are made with the intention of causing injury and death
(normally thought to be a bad thing) would be against ensuring that everyone
can afford the means to maintain a long and healthy life (normally thought to
be a good thing).
On second
thought, this twisted logic does make perfect sense…for them and anyone else who
believes in a common sense that runs counter to survival of the human race.
The budget
is heavy on gutting programs that protect the poor and downtrodden, and very
light — many would say non-existent — on raising revenues from taxes. I really don’t understand the GOP’s Ebenezer
Scrooge-like attitude towards the poor. It’s not like they can gather all these people up (a la Adolph Hitler) and send
them away somewhere else where they can be someone else’s responsibility or
burden. It’s not like the corporations who
support the GOP are not dependent on these same poor people to buy their cheap
hamburgers and cheap toilet paper which they have to use once their bodies have
fully digested the cheap hamburgers. (Yes, I went there!) The GOP and
their supporters need the poverty-stricken people of the United States whether
they know or not, and whether they like it or not.
So why are
they so dead set (pun intended) on adopting policies that will make life more
difficult for the lower and, for that matter, middle classes? Damned if I know!
Why don’t
the American people in these lower reaches of the economy have the right to
affordable health care? Ryan’s budget
makes no secret of the fact that they want to kill Obamacare and replace it
with a “patient oriented” system. I
have my doubts about their system. Since I have not heard any details of this plan over the last 20 years, I doubt that the conservatives in Congress have a plan at all. In all that time, I’ve been listening for
details of their plan, but all I’ve heard is silence.
One proposal
by Joseph McCarthy heir apparent Congressman Ted Cruz defunds Obamacare
temporarily until the economy is proven to be growing again. I could see postponing aspects of the
Affordable Care Act, if I were certain that it was only a postponement. Who’s to say that once the economy does show
improvement that the GOP won’t find another excuse to postpone it again? I don’t trust them.
Americans
with little or no access to affordable health care need to stand up and demand that
their legislators stand behind Obamacare. The law’s repeal will mean a return of insurance claim denials for
pre-existing conditions, among other health insurance peculiarities. Another job layoff with a concurrent gap in
health care coverage could be disastrous for me and millions of others if the
pre-existing clause was allowed to return.
We should
probably take a cue from the gun lobby and advocate for Obamacare’s survival
with the same extremist zeal that they use. Perhaps we could co-op one of their more famous slogans. Maybe we should rise up and cry out, “You’ll
only take away my health care when you pry my Medicare card from my cold, dead
fingers.”
Hmmm...that
might be too extremist. This may need
some more work….
(Thank you
for reading! Give us preventative
colonoscopies or give us death! Nahhh….)
6 Comments:
But the economy is improving -- so much that Wall Street is ecstatic! And if Romney/Ryan had won, they would have taken all the credit for the improving economy, saying "I told you so!"
Obamacare is our one chance to get healthcare right. It would be even better if it were a single payor plan -- that is Medicare from birth to death. To hell with the insurance companies and their middleman greed!
David
Politics as usual!
this is only a test
Thank you for the comments. The socialize medicine model seems to work fine in other countries, but I guess we're not good enough for the single payer concept. Sigh!
Republicans are so afraid of socialism. Do they know what it is? The most socialized countries are the Scandinavian countries such as Denmark. Yes, they have high taxes, but their taxes work for them providing free medical care, social security, and free higher education. That is why the Scandinavian people consistently rank as the happiest people in the world!
I know. Go figure!
Post a Comment
<< Home